Reverse Evolution

"Info Junkie" <bondrock.RemoveThis@ifx.net> wrote in message
news:4554cf57.28753446@news.ifx.net...

> Of course it "could reasonably be interpreted that way", when he was
> quoted as
> saying he "...took the initiative in creating the Internet."
> http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,18390,00.html
>
> Only hypocrites that believe his words "...could (NOT) reasonably be
> interpreted
> that way" may also accept the re-defining of what "..."IS" is...".

What complete utter bullshit. A politician with no technical expertise
whatsoever, but with a known capability for fostering high-tech through
policy initiatives says the above and you "reasonably interpret" that he is
claiming he laid fiber-optic cable, developed firmware and wrote code?

Your criteria for what constitutes reasonable is not mainstream.

That's like looking at what Kerry said last week and reasonably inferring
that he really did intend to insult American soldiers (which he himself once
was) and not Bush (who shirked his duty and his books.

But leave it to Bush to either be too dull to understand or too desperate to
avoid the temptation to respond as he did. You be the judge.

Hey everyone! The neocon loons are coming out of hiding!
 >> Stay informed about: Reverse Evolution 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Reverse Evolution 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Reverse Evolution 

On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 02:07:52 +0000, Jd wrote:

> Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:21:40 +0000, Jd wrote:
>>
>>> You have heard how an amoeba evolved into a critter which crawled up
>>> out of the primorial slime and eventually became an ape, which
>>> eventually became a human....
>>
>>Yes, we've heard that strawman before...
>
> You took Biology in high school also?

So that's as far as you got eh?

--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"...otherwise, we're looking at the potential
of this kind of world:.... a world in which
oil reserves are controlled by radicals in order
to extract blackmail from the West..." [George Bush]

Wait... oil reserves?
 >> Stay informed about: Reverse Evolution 

Of course we have reverse evolution

Just look at these past Presidents: Washington, Adams, Jefferson,
Lincoln.

Now look at the shrub.

Isn't this an excelent example of reverse evolution?

Jd wrote:
> You have heard how an amoeba evolved into a critter which crawled up
> out of the primorial slime and eventually became an ape, which
> eventually became a human.... but now here is proof that a "common
> ancestor" had descendants which crawled back into the ocean and
> reversed, or at least hindered the evolutionary process:
>
> "Fossil remains show dolphins and whales were four-footed land animals
> about 50 million years ago and share the same common ancestor as
> hippos and deer. Scientists believe they later transitioned to an
> aquatic lifestyle and their hind limbs disappeared."
>
> http://dailynews.att.net/cgi-bin/news?e=pub&dt=061106&cat=science&st=s...nced8l7
>
> Think about it. Had dolphins not gone back into the sea they just
> might've invented the internet millions of years before Al Gore did,
> and you just might be able to drive your SUV without having to worry
> about "global warming" by now.
>
> Jd
 >> Stay informed about: Reverse Evolution 

On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 17:21:40 -0600, Jd wrote
(in article <c6duk2tcff40ttc8bmgvu9b978e4kqdmbs.RemoveThis@4ax.com>):

> You have heard how an amoeba evolved into a critter which crawled up
> out of the primorial slime and eventually became an ape, which
> eventually became a human.... but now here is proof that a "common
> ancestor" had descendants which crawled back into the ocean and
> reversed, or at least hindered the evolutionary process:
>
> "Fossil remains show dolphins and whales were four-footed land animals
> about 50 million years ago and share the same common ancestor as
> hippos and deer. Scientists believe they later transitioned to an
> aquatic lifestyle and their hind limbs disappeared."
>
>
http://dailynews.att.net/cgi-
bin/news?e=pub&dt=061106&cat=science&st=scienced8
> l756601&src=ap
>
> Think about it. Had dolphins not gone back into the sea they just
> might've invented the internet millions of years before Al Gore did,
> and you just might be able to drive your SUV without having to worry
> about "global warming" by now.
>
> Jd
>

There's no such thing as "global warming".

Or, at least, that was one of the Republican campaign planks.

Now, they can walk it.


The Bushettes say there is no such thing as "global warning".


Therefore, we know that "global warning" is real.

You know, like "winning" in Iraq.


Gray Shockley
------------------------
Vice-President Cheney,
in the 1960s, had other
priorities than gun safety.
 >> Stay informed about: Reverse Evolution 

On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 17:21:40 -0600, Jd wrote
(in article <c6duk2tcff40ttc8bmgvu9b978e4kqdmbs.DeleteThis@4ax.com>):

> You have heard how an amoeba evolved into a critter which crawled up
> out of the primorial slime and eventually became an ape, which
> eventually became a human.... but now here is proof that a "common
> ancestor" had descendants which crawled back into the ocean and
> reversed, or at least hindered the evolutionary process:
>
> "Fossil remains show dolphins and whales were four-footed land animals
> about 50 million years ago and share the same common ancestor as
> hippos and deer. Scientists believe they later transitioned to an
> aquatic lifestyle and their hind limbs disappeared."
>
>
http://dailynews.att.net/cgi-
bin/news?e=pub&dt=061106&cat=science&st=scienced8
> l756601&src=ap
>
> Think about it. Had dolphins not gone back into the sea they just
> might've invented the internet millions of years

Why do you think they look so happy?

> before Al Gore did,
> and you just might be able to drive your SUV without having to worry
> about "global warming" by now.

"SUV" is out. These vehicles are now referred to as "Suburban Ladies
Utility Transport".


Gray /That's enough for now./




> Jd
>
 >> Stay informed about: Reverse Evolution 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Reverse Evolution 

On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:28:10 -0600, Jd Ringer wrote:

> Bob LeChevalier wrote:
>
>> Jd <ZionsFire RemoveThis @att.net> wrote:
>>> Bob LeChevalier wrote:
>>>> Jd <ZionsFire RemoveThis @att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You have heard how an amoeba evolved into a critter which crawled up
>>>>> out of the primorial slime and eventually became an ape, which
>>>>> eventually became a human.... but now here is proof that a "common
>>>>> ancestor" had descendants which crawled back into the ocean and
>>>>> reversed, or at least hindered the evolutionary process
>>>>
>>>> Going back to the sea neither reverses nor hinders the evolutionary
>>>> process.
>>>
>>> Then why did the dolphins not keep the legs they were evolving?
>>
>> Because they aren't especially useful in the sea.
>>
>>> You idjut. Had evolution not reversed itself,
>>
>> Evolution did not reverse itself.
>>
>>> dolphins might very well
>>> be ruling the planet now (assuming they went ahead and grew legs 50
>>> million years ago as the article suggested).
>>
>> They didn't "grow legs 50 million years ago".
>>
>> Their ancestors *had* legs like your ancestors did. The ancestors
>> that first developed legs when they moved onto land might have been
>> that same ancestors for both you and the dolphins.
>>
>>> Do you not recall the latest study which shows the 1 million year
>>> error in evolutionary thinking which puts men evolving from apes at a
>>> mere 4 million years ago?
>>
>> You seem to think that is important. It isn't.
>
> Well of course you would say that believing in the ToE as you do.
>
> I hate to disappoint you but I have proof that evolution is a hoax.
> And by that I mean that if I can prove evolution is impossible in even
> 1 species that exist today, (not counting humans which we already know
> that no prof exists) it shreds the entire theory. Agree?
>
> So here goes (whether you agree or not). The species I've chosen is
> the South American false-eyed frog.
>
> Here is a brief description:
>
> "The South American false-eyed frog is an interesting creature.
> Generally about 3 inches long, it is brown, black, blue, gray, and
> white! Drops of each color are on its skin, and it can suddenly change
> from one of these colors to the others, simply by masking out certain
> color spots."
>
> "The change-color effect that this frog regularly produces is totally
> amazing, and completely unexplainable by any kind of evolutionary
> theory. The frog will be sitting in the jungle minding its own
> business, when an enemy, such as a snake or rat, will come along.
> Instantly, that frog will jump and turn around, so that its back is
> now facing the intruder. In that same instance, the frog changed its
> colors!"
>
> "Now the enemy sees a big head, nose, mouth, and two black and blues
> eyes! To the side of the fake face, there appear long claws! These are
> the frog’s toes! As the frog tucks his legs to the sides of his body,
> he purposely lifts up two toes from each hind foot—and curls them out,
> so they will look like a couple of weird hooks."
>
> "And the frog does all this in one second!"
>
> "At this, the predator leaves, feeling quite defeated. But that which
> it left behind is a tasty, defenseless, weak frog which can turn
> around quickly, but cannot hop away very fast."
>
> "All scientists will agree that this frog does not do these things
> because of intelligence, but as a result of coding within its DNA. How
> did that coding get there? It requires intelligence to produce a code.
> Random codes are meaningless and designs never arise though random
> activity. They require intelligent planning. Genetic codes within
> living creatures are the most complicated of humans to devise and
> fabricate."
>
> "The facts are clear. God made that frog, and He made all other living
> creatures also. Only His careful thought could produce and implant
> those codes and the physical systems they call for."
>
> "There can be no other answer."


Yeah but He got an F in universe planning.

And the durn professors (adult gods, everyone) totally forgot to
wipe out the universe that was so poorly created by the young,
junior god.


> http://www.evolution-facts.org/Ev-Crunch/c24.htm
>
> Get back to your Bible Bob. You've been spending too much time
> Googling..... and it shows.
>
> Jd
>
> "Is not my word like as a fire? saith the Lord; and like a hammer that
> breaketh the rock in pieces?" (Jeremiah 23:29)


Hammer? Hm,m,m - hammer? Ah, yes, Tom DeLay. So let's try this one:
"Is not my word like as a fire about this high? And like Tom DeLay
that breaketh the rock in pieces at the big house?"

If it fits, wear it.

Gs
 >> Stay informed about: Reverse Evolution 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Reverse Evolution 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Reverse Evolution 

On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 17:58:32 -0600, Matt Silberstein wrote:

> Nope. Evolution means change, not progress.


Speaking of "progress", so to speak, does anyone have an URL for a
complete "story" of the 2006 elections?

I mean in less than 25 screens.

Though [sigh], HuffPost will prolly have it in a couple of days.


The BushieThing had "political capital" but, now, the boy has
declared political and ethical bankruptcy.

Future political economic writers may well, in the future, refer to
it as the "Bush Bubble".

And, if you have read of the American Legion's political and
religious participation in the last few weeks, it's pretty obvious
why I have never - and will never - join that political and
religious lobby.


Just tell me you're attempting to lead a "Christ-like" life rather
than simply calling yourself a "Christian" just like the inmates on
death row.

Gray Shockley /Yes; I talked with them./
 >> Stay informed about: Reverse Evolution 

JD, you have no sense of humor I am afraid.

Of course, this is not an original joke with me. It was said by Henry
James, discussing some of the current Presidents he lived under in the
XIXth century, that comparing them with our forefahters, they disproved
Darwin's theory.

But you have to admit that the shrub does fit the bill...

Jd wrote:
> Callisto wrote:
>
> >
> >Of course we have reverse evolution
> >
> >Just look at these past Presidents: Washington, Adams, Jefferson,
> >Lincoln.
> >
> >Now look at the shrub.
> >
> >Isn't this an excelent example of reverse evolution?
>
> Actually what we have in the aforementioned case is double reverse
> evolution. For whales being mammals, to have sprouted legs while in
> the sea and crawled up on land then going back into the sea and losing
> their legs, means that they had previously evolved (if you believe in
> evolution) into air breathing critters on land, then devolved back
> into the sea where they evolved legs again which they abruptly lost.
>
> But judging from your above comments, I think that your liberal mind
> has absoultely no possibility of even grasping simple reverse
> evolution.
>
> So forget all of the above and just let someone else reply.
>
> Jd
 >> Stay informed about: Reverse Evolution